🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a flawed assessment of the European Union. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "progressive" policies represent an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misreading of the situation. The actual challenge confronting the EU is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Divide Between Europe and the US

Statistics paint a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, while a mere thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. During this period, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the US level. Strikingly, even Mississippi now has a greater average income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while only four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Problem

This widening disparity stems from stronger efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is decidedly American. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This disparity raises a vital issue: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Experts widely concede it is largely a contest between two involving the US and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

A number of key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true unified investment market, which caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hinder Europe. A US startup can introduce a service under one set of laws to access a market of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a larger population, is divided among twenty-seven separate regimes, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

In spite of these challenges, there are reasons for hope. European leaders are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the internal market highlight the need for sweeping reforms.

Given appropriate incentives and rule changes, these assets could support much higher degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses significant advantages: high-quality human capital, excellent schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these elements could unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not take the lead in creating next-generation technologies, it can still significantly boost economic output by adopting and adapting advancements from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, the continent's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's gradual weakening could give way to a sudden and irreversible loss of world influence.