🔗 Share this article

According to several official sources, Beijing has reportedly threatened to respond against the United Kingdom if officials move to target certain elements of its security infrastructure under recently established foreign influence registration requirements.

Diplomatic Tensions Escalate

Chinese representatives reportedly conveyed this message to the Foreign Office soon after news surfaced that the British administration was contemplating such measures. This development has heightened alarm bells given the government's continued hesitance to apply more rigorous external lobbying regulations on lobbyists representing Beijing or any segment of the PRC government.

Current Foreign Influence Registration Scheme

At present, only Russia and Iran have been placed on the stricter category of the external lobbying registry (Firs), which was launched in July and became fully operational this month. This system requires anyone in the United Kingdom representing a external government or entity to disclose their activities to the authorities or risk criminal sanctions.

• The stricter tier applies to nations and entities deemed a significant threat.
• It requires additional reporting above the standard requirements.
• As a result, anyone conducting undeclared work on behalf of Iran or Moscow could receive up to 60 months in prison.

Potential Designations

Previously, reports indicated that rather than designating China as a complete entity, UK officials were considering including certain parts of the PRC governmental structure that have been accused of meddling in western affairs to the stricter tier.

These organizations allegedly include:

• The PRC's primary intelligence agency
• The CCP (CCP)
• Beijing's united front apparatus
• The People's Liberation Army (PLA)

Collapsed Spying Case

Simultaneously, the government is under growing pressure over the sudden dismissal of an espionage case involving two British citizens, comprising a ex- parliamentary researcher. the first defendant, a former parliamentary aide to Tory parliamentarians, and his associate the second defendant had been accused of spying for Beijing.

Their trial was unexpectedly dropped by the public prosecution authority in mid-September. The accused men had denied the allegations.

Legal Challenges

Journalistic accounts suggested that the government's refusal to officially characterize China as an "adversarial state" in official testimony from a intelligence representative led to the case's collapse. Jonathan Powell, the prime minister's top security official, allegedly led a discussion in the UK government headquarters where he told officials that the state's evidence would avoid labeling Beijing an enemy.

Government sources subsequently denied the allegation that Powell was responsible for restricting government evidence.

The judicial complication stemmed from the Official Secrets Act of 1911, which states that a person is responsible for spying if they pass on information "beneficial to a hostile power". However, the present government's security policy describes Beijing as a "strategic competitor" rather than an adversary.

Ongoing Bilateral Relations

Despite these tensions, UK-China relations appear to be improving. Several high-level UK officials have visited Beijing on state trips since the current administration took office. These include Peter Kyle, who participated in trade talks last month, and the national security adviser, who traveled during the warmer months.

Furthermore, talks have reportedly taken place between diplomatic corps representatives and legislative officials regarding the prospect of removing the prohibition on the Chinese ambassador accessing the legislature, potentially in return for China removing its restrictions on British legislators.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer is widely expected to make a bilateral trip to China in the beginning of the coming year, though the exact timing might be influenced by global developments, including a possible trip by former US President the Republican figure.